As a GSD breeder, I don't see any value in it as you've outlined it, apart from perhaps as an income generator for the entrepreneur who owns the register.
Nor do I see the slightest justification for including the Vastgotaspests/Valhund but excluding the almost-identical Corgis.
Were you to go ahead you would have to decide early on a logical way to establish which breeds are "in" and which "out". Which will put you torn between
(a) the FCI's established system for breed acceptance,
(b) the "determined to be independent" attitude of the AKC's system, and
(c) several accepted-by-farmers "breeds" that have no official recognition.
However, it looks as though you might do well to consider separating the breeds into 3 or 4 categories according to their primary task:
• herders of ovines (sheep, goats)
• herders of bovines (cows, deer)
• guards of ovines
• guards of bovines
For establishing that a pooch is actually representative of its breed, go study the Breed Survey system as used by breeders and owners of genuine GSDs - in North America it is operated by the GSSCC, the USCA, and the WDA.
A summary of the pre-entry requirements is:
#1: Must be in the country's Breed Registry
#2: Must have official hip and elbow certificates
#3: Must have a show grading certificate of "Good" or better
#4: Must have an Endurance Dog qualification (basically, a timed 12 miles/20km trot)
#5: Must have a trainability-plus-courage qualification - for GSDs that means first obtaining the BH (a "street safe" test from which CGC probably got its ideas) then going on to qualify in either HGH (herding + courage) or SchH (obedience + tracking + courage)
Being eligible to enter doesn't necessarily mean that the entrant will obtain a classification.
Each entrant is gaited, measured, gun tested, described (much as with a specialist show critique), and a 2 page report filled out (contact lesp@xtra.co.nz if you want to see a scan of a report). There are 3 possible outcomes:
● BS.Cl.1 (KKl.I in German) = "Well above average. Recommended for breeding", available to GSDs that fit within every limit in the FCI Standard (see http://www.fci.be/nomenclatures.asp?lang=en&sel=0 for the REAL Standard of every actually recognised breed; normally the FCI accepts only the Country of Origin Standard, but where none exists - as with the Iberian Collie now know as The Australian Shepherd - then the Country of Development Standard is accepted) and whose ancestry indicates no serious risks.
● BS.Cl.2 (KKl.II in German) = "Above average. Approved for breeding", available to GSDs no more than 1cm outside the height limit and with no more than 1or 2 minor tooth faults, and so on, with only minor risks indicated by the pedigree (in Yank terms that might be that the pooch is OFA Fair instead of OFA Excellent or OFA Good).
● Fail.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Among the flaws in your scheme is that most of the top sheep dogs and cattle dogs from "DownUnder" are instantly ineligible - the breeders and users of the NZ Heading Dog (aka the Eye Dog) and the NZ Huntaway declined to accept NZKC's offer to establish a Breed Registry for them - THEY know that acceptance as a show dog and just-a-pet ruins every working breed (whether herding or hunting or guarding), taking the emphasis off functionality and putting it onto show points and "cuteness". A high proportion of breeders and users of the Australian Cattle Dog and the Australian Kelpie similarly refuse to have anything to do with a kennel club.
Another is that it just adds to the disunity in the NAmerican canine scene, producing yet another splinter group.
Far better is to operate as the GSD Council of Australia does. That body had first to work on politicians in order to get the bans on GSDs lifted - most GSD people are aware that GSDs were not allowed to be imported into Australia from 1929 to 1972, but not all are aware that it wasn't until Xmas Eve 1976 that Western Australia allowed non-neutered GSDs within its borders. Its more recent coup, in conjunction with the Rottweiler groups, was persuading a couple of state KCs in 1996 & 97 to apply registration limitations, and then having the ANKC announce that as of May 1999 no litter of GSDs or Rotties can be registered unless both parents:
#1: Are in the Breed Registry with an allowable coat colour
#2: Possess official scores for hip and elbow dysplasia
#3: Either possess an official haemophilia-negative certificate or have a purely Australian-bred pedigree, if a GSD litter (they quickly weeded out the few haemophilia lines they'd imported, and for decades since have produced no further haemophiliacs).
None of THAT could have been accomplished if the breeders & owners had been disunited.
The GSDCAustralia is taking a very light touch regarding SchutzHund, because of the historical attitude of politically-powerful graziers towards the GSD breed, and because the ANKC displays on its web-site that it will ban anyone known to participate in anything where dogs bite.
Another example of the power of unity, this time among a section of Yank owners of GSDs, is that the AKC was persuaded, a couple of years ago, to accept SchH, albeit under a Yank name.
I consider that a far more useful approach would be to act as a lobby group to have the breed clubs of ALL the herding breeds unite to persuade the AKC that
(A) All herding/droving breeds should be in a Pastoral" or "Sheep & Cattle" group, and the Standards issued by the AKC will be those accepted by the FCI.
(B) All those breeds should have restrictions as to which parents can have their litters registered. (I'm confident that the SPCA & other humane societies and the rescue groups would thoroughly approve of restrictions that make it impossible for lazy imbeciles to pump out litters of barely-recognisable "purebreds" and get AKC registration for their pups and thus be able to charge prices close to what stock from dedicated breeders merits!)
Once those restrictions based on ancestry, the Standard, and "health certificates" have become well-accepted, it will be easier to petition to have a requirement for both parents to possess an appropriate "performance certificate", with HGH being an obvious one for sheep-herding breeds and IPO (the FCI's version of SchH) being an obvious one for guarding breeds.
Don't expect the AKC to be enthusiastic about the concept - each restriction reduces the number of litters from which it can collect registration fees, and KCs around the world are already hurting financially as a result of the downturn in registered breeding (the fad for unregisterable "designer dog" cross-breeds is only part of the problem) and in show entries.
From fans of the UKC I get the impression that you'd get a better response there, but the UKC is a dead end with no possibility of ever being recognised by the international canine community, so your efforts must go to your country's national KC.
In whatever form you choose to go ahead, aim to be NOT a rival to the AKC but a forum where fanciers of pastoral breeds can develop a system then negotiate with AKC to either accept the plans in toto or set "you" up as an AKC sub-committee to further develop the proposal.
Les P, owner of GSD_Friendly: http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/GSD_Friendly
"In GSDs" as of 1967