Um, where is the link????
Lol.
-------------
I can't watch it all right now, so will probably add later.
He didn't exactly say that. He says that there is enough truth to it to keep the illusion going.
I kinda hear the opposite, not that a dog has it or that it doesn't, but that a lot of mediocre dogs are doing better because of training.
I will be back later. I do want to see the rest.
----
Ah, I see where this is going.
That is not my experience with the K9s washed out from here. Our trainer uses the method you suggest and our dropout rate is still high.
I have to go, will be back.
@DSR - giving you a TU just for putting him in his place. Lol.
------------
Alright, I am back (couldn't waste my data package watching on my iPhone).
I don't disagree with him. I do believe that how the dog is raised can affect the dog. I don't really have a ton of experience in puppies. When I first read the question, I thought we were talking about washing out older dogs. I notice that even the "host" was saying that after 6 months, the superstar puppies were just average, and sold off to pets because he hadn't worked them to their potential.
So if we are talking washing out older dogs because they don't have "it", they agree.
What I was originally going to say was many working dog handlers don't get puppies, they get older dogs, past even the 6 months mentioned here. Also, if we are talking about people who are using these dogs for work purposes, time and money is invested in these dogs. Even if we suppose that the right training could take a dog to a higher level, most working dog handlers simply don't have the luxury of time. Time is money. I also think there is a big difference between training a dog to certify and a dog having "it". Which one would I rather having my back, the one who took considerable training to get the right drives/training, or the one who had it to start with and was enhanced with training.
The trainer here uses the same techniques mentioned by Ellis with all dogs. We still have a very high washout rate.
I think there is a considerable difference between washing out a Police K9 for not having "it" and washing out a Schutzhund hobby dog.
--------------
I still think Kaper wouldn't have been suitable, but I agree with you too. I can't explain it. And I find such a considerable difference between he and Hary.
In a different setting, he may have been successful, even the trainer now (who was only a handler back then) says that. But the simple fact is we have time and budget constraints. We can't afford to take the extra time to bring out what is needed, if it can be brought out.
And his problem was tracking. Plain and simple.
Sorry, I can't see why you love him. I could never date a guy with longer hair than mine. LOL.
(I had more, but the rest of the video changed the context some and I am tired and cranky)